I can agree with the assumption written in the post that
performance is the big umbrella under which theatre is a subset. I say this
because there are many types of performance, as we discovered in Carlson’s
“Performance: A critical introduction.” Rather than just coded behavior, there
is a display of skills that is necessary theatre but what makes theatre
different from sports are the conventions that surround it. At least that is
one aspect. The stage, the curtains, playbills, dimming of lights, etc. are all
al conventions that let one know that they are about to experience theatre.
One could argue, “Well, what about a concert or opera? Is that theatre?
They dim the lights, there are curtains and programs and a stage and such.”
What further helps here is chapter two of “Performance Studies: An
Introduction” by Schechner. He makes a distinction between performance that is
“make-belief” and “make-believe.” “Make-belief” performance is performance of
everyday life. He gives the example of the presidency. We all know that the
president reads from speeches written for him and carries himself in a way that
is expected of a president (well, this is typically the case…). This is not
performance with the purpose of making an audience think they are something
that they are not. It is simply a presentation based on societal expectations.
“Make-Believe” is what theatre is – there is an accepted and clearly distinct
difference between the actor and the roles that they play. Those who sit down
to watch theatre are not primarily there to see what the actor would say or make
up (unless it’s improvisation – but even then there is knowledge that the
actors are acting not simply living their lives or performing an athletic
skill). They know that the playwright has written a script they are there to
see how the plot unfolds.
Of course these lines are blurry and I believe that it’s
because theatre is actually telling the truth. And if you are telling the
truth, aren’t you not performing? This is why performance art is often
separated from theatre because of the nature of not usually assuming a character or a role.
I see what you're saying. My question though lies in your example of the president reading a speech that was written for him. The distinction between a speech written for the president and a speech/monologue in a script is that the president is going to effect everyday life (or at least has the potential to) and the monologue isn't. So my question is, is the difference between performance and theatre whether or not the piece can impact real life? That was what I found confusing about the "make belief" and "make believe" when I read Schechner. Though, that can't be the only question because we all know that sometimes concerts don't have a message. Then again, there was a message when Beyonce's Superbowl performance when she performed Formation. I'm just saying nothing makes sense to me and we're just on rock hurling through time and space and all I want is a cookie. :)
ReplyDelete